Posted by: Kristi Yoos on: September 1, 2008
On the first day of my introduction to PR class, Dr. V asked me to write a definition of PR. I find it interesting and almost humorous that my definition intertwines all of the things that PR is not, according to Bill Sledzik’s recent blog post. That is, before I was given the opportunity to understand what PR is and what PR practitioners do, my definition encompassed advertising, publicizing, promoting, selling, communication, media relations,-and the most dreadful rumor of them all- marketing. After reading Sledzik’s blog, I think that one comment in particular helped me understand what PR really is and why it is not the things listed above. Brandon Carlos noted that PR is a mind-set that borrows and encompasses the best elements of communication, marketing, media relations, ect. I like to think of it as a “tool-box.” That is, every PR professional has a metaphorical “too-box” of knowledge that they have created from their experiences, seminars, classes, lectures, readings, and other education and life experiences. They can use the things that they have accumulated in their tool-box to help them make decisions and be a better PR professional. While their tool-boxes clearly make them better PR professionals, it is nothing more than a compilation of acquired tools stemming from a variety of disciplines. That is, the best of everything that they have learned and experienced that will help them be a better PR practitioner goes into their own tool-box to be used at a later time.
[...] 3, 2008 Kristy has a great way of explaining the big picture differences between marketing & PR. Excellent [...]
September 3, 2008 at 1:24 pm
Kristy, this is a GREAT way to put it!
Yes, there is a toolbox, and different people might have the same tools, but what differentiates PR from marketing is often the mindset.
The mindset stems from different beliefs (the theories we talked about in class explain them) and from different overarching, strategic goals.